Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
Pertanika Journal Home Facebook
Pertanika · Universiti Putra Malaysia Press

Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities

Official journal of Universiti Putra Malaysia for scholarly work across the social sciences, humanities and related interdisciplinary fields.

e-ISSN 2231-8534 ISSN 0128-7702
Research article

From Utopian Dream to Dystopian Nightmare: A Protopian Response to A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court

Chander Shekhar and Smita Jha

https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.3.03
KeywordsDystopia, electricity, post-political, protopia, techno-theodicy, utopia, violence
Article content

Abstract

This article examines the idea of protopia as propounded in Kevin Kelly’s The Inevitable (2016), which is anticipated in Mark Twain’s novel A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court (1889). Contrarily, Hank Morgan, the protagonist, feigns to achieve utopia, to secure power and privilege, not to realize utopia itself. However, Kelly’s suggestion of technology as the center of civilization takes us toward the state of protopia. Unfortunately, it is misused for mass extermination in the novel. Drawing critical insights from Fick, Hansen, Lieberman, Dobski, and Kleinerman, this article investigates the scope of protopian response through reader-response theory and attempts to highlight how Hank’s techno-politics (pure) is in resonation with Twain’s protopian vision. It further reveals how it is corrupted by practical politics (impure) for power and comfort, for which Twain criticizes Hank. This research provides a blueprint for thinking through and avoiding the abuses of technoscientific power that the novel so horrifically puts on display for future readers. It endeavors to unearth the protopian reading scope to re-read this dystopian novel as a narrative of progress. This paper argues that to achieve the quintessential goal of humanity, protopia appears to be an appropriate model since utopia is unachievable.
Supporting literature

References

  1. Andersen, K. (1969). The ending of Mark Twain’s A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. Mark Twain Journal, 14(4), 21.
  2. Bielskyte, M. (2021, May 19). Protopia futures [Framework]. Medium. https://medium.com/protopia-futures/protopia-futures-framework-f3c2a5d09a1e
  3. Bloch, E. (1995). The principle of hope (Vol. 1; N. Plaice, P. Knight, & S. Plaice, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published in 1954)
  4. Dobski, B. J., Jr., & Kleinerman, B. A. (2007). We should see certain things yet, let us hope and believe: Technology, sex, and politics in Mark Twain’s Connecticut Yankee. The Review of Politics, 69(4), 599-624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670507000976
  5. Evans, B. (2021). Ecce Humanitas: Beholding the pain of humanity. Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7312/evan18462
  6. Evans, B., & Lennard, N. (2018). Violence: Humans in dark times. City Lights Book.
  7. Fermanis, P. (2007). Culture, counter- culture, and the subversion of the comic in Mark Twain’s A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. The Mark Twain Annual, 5(1), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2597.2007.tb00056.x
  8. Fick, T. H. (1988). Mark Twain’s machine politics: Unmetaphoring in A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. American Literary Realism, 20(2), 30-42.
  9. Google Design. (2019, May 18). Design Is [Protopian] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixg7e1fWdM0&feature=youtu.be
  10. Hansen, C. (1973). The once and future boss: Mark Twain’s Yankee. Nineteenth Century Fiction, 28(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2933153
  11. Johnson, R. M. (1990). Future as past, past as future: Edward Bellamy, Mark Twain, and the Crisis of the 1880s. American Studies in Scandinavia, 22(2), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v22i2.1161
  12. Kaplan, A. (2022). Realism and power in Mark Twain’s: A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. American Literary Realism, 54(3), 193-233. https://doi.org/10.5406/19405103.54.3.02
  13. Kateb, G. (1963). Utopia and its enemies. Free Press of Glance.
  14. Kelly, K. (2016). The inevitable. Viking.
  15. Lieberman, J. L. (2010). Hank Morgan’s Power Play: Electrical networks in King Arthur’s Court. The Mark Twain Annual, 8(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2597.2010.00041.x
  16. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.-a). Dystopia. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved May 16, 2023, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dystopia
  17. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.-b). Utopia. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved May 16, 2023, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/utopia
  18. Moore, T. (1551). Utopia. Duke Classics.
  19. O’Neill, J. A. (2007). Twain’s A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court and U.S. Imperialism. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 9(3), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1224
  20. Rohman, C. (2009). Mark Twain’s ‘A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court’: Serio comic and carnival prospects unfulfilled. Studies in American Humor, 3(20), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/42573714
  21. Sanchez, R. (2007). Mark Twain, Hank Morgan, and Menippean Satire in ‘A Connecticut Yankee.’ Studies in American Humor, 3(15), 19-43.
  22. Sargent, L. T. (1982). Authority & utopia: Utopianism in political thought. Polity, 14(4), 565-584. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234464
  23. Strout, C. (2012). Crisis in Camelot Mark Twain and The Idea of Progress. The Sewanee Review, 120(2), 336-340. https://doi.org/10.1353/sew.2012.0039
  24. Twain, M. (1889). A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. Dover Publication.