This study explores gender issues in the historical narrative structure of A. S. Byatt’s novel Possession: A Romance (1990) by critically examining women’s exclusion from society, men’s identity crisis in gender environments, and the separation and union between two sexes in the novel. To reveal these complicated gender issues, Byatt combines history with narrative, which accords well with Hayden White’s historical narrative that fictive history can unveil historical truth. Additionally, Byatt’s three levels of historical narratives echo Giambattista Vico’s cycle of history to reveal the recurring gender issues in human history. In this respect, this study investigates how Byatt uses historical narratives to examine gender dilemmas of men and women to explore how characters free themselves from their gendered travails. In conclusion, Byatt employs historical narratives to reveal the recurring gender dilemmas and gender opposition in the history of human development. Meanwhile, Byatt is seeking a new type of gender relations in the cycle of human history as well—it is androgyny that liberates men and women from the limitation of defined gender roles and dissolves gendered conflicts to realize the union between body and soul in men and women.

• Bakhtin, M. M. (2010). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.

• Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

• Byatt, A. S. (1990). Possession: A romance. Vintage Press.

• Byatt, A. S. (1993). The shadow of the sun. Mariner Books.

• Byatt, A. S. (2001). On histories and stories: Selected essays. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv24rgbmz

• Campbell, J. (2004). A. S. Byatt and the heliotropic imagination. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

• Cixous, H. (1988). Tancredi continues. In S. Sellers (Ed.), Writing differences: Readings from seminar of Hélène Cixous (pp. 37-53). Open University Press.

• De Beauvoir, S. (1984). The second sex. Random House Press.

• Farahmandfar, M. (2017). History, myth, and nationhood in A. S. Byatt’s Possession. Forum for World Literature Studies, 9(3), 475-488.

• Franken, C. (2001). A. S. Byatt: Art, authorship, creativity. Palgrave Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510043

• Frye, N. (1981). Great code: The bible and literature. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Press.

• Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (1980). The madwoman in the attic: The woman writer and the nineteenth-century literary imagination. Yale University Press.

• Heilbrun, C. G. (1973). Toward a recognition of androgyny. Alfred A. Knopf Press.

• Ioannidou, E. (2020). Indispensable redundancy: The poetic abscesses of A. S. Byatt’s Possession: A Romance (1990). Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 61(4), 412-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2020.1730743

• Kenyon, O. (1988). A. S. Byatt: Fusing tradition with twentieth-century experimentation. In O. Kenyon (Ed.), Women novelists today: A survey of English writing in the Seventieth and Eightieth (pp. 51-84). Harvester.

• Lawrence, D. H. (1930). A propos of Lady Chatterley’ s lover. Mandrake Press.

• Pereira, M. E. (2019). Stories within stories: Fairy tales as intertextual fragments in A. S. Byatt’s Possession: A Romance. In M. E. Lee & A. Penn (Eds.), The radiance of the short story: Fiction from around the globe-selected conference papers (pp. 312-323). Kindle Direct Publishing. https://hdl.handle.net/1822/62410

• Sedgwick, E. K. (2007). Gender criticism. In S. Greenblatt & G. B. Gunn (Eds.), Redrawing the boundaries: The transformation of English and American literary studies. Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

• Showalter, E. (1977). A literature of their Own: British women novelists from Bronte to Lessing. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691221960

• Steveker, L. (2009). Identity and cultural memory in the fiction of A. S. Byatt. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248595

• Vico, G. (1984). The new science of Giambattista Vico (T. G. Bergin, & M. H. Fisch, Trans.). Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1744)

• Wallhead, C. M. (1999). The old, the new and the metaphor: A critical study of the novels of A. S. Byatt. Minerva Press.

• Wells, L. (2002). Corso, ricorso: Historical repetition and cultural reflection in A. S. Byatt’s Possession: A Romance. Modern Fiction Studies, 48(3), 668-692. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2002.0071

• White, H. (1975). The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.

• White, H. (1990). The content of form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Johns Hopkins University Press.

• Woolf, V. (1929). A room of one’s own. Routledge.

• Zhang, X. C. (2020). The cauda pavonis and Byatt’s female visionary in the Tetralogy. English Studies, 101(4), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2020.1800220

• Zhang, X. C. (2021). Melusina and A. S. Byatt’s alchemical imagination in Possession: A Romance. English Studies, 102(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2020.1866309