Home / Regular Issue / JST Vol. 29 (4) Dec. 2021 / JSSH-8211-2021

 

The Role of Religiosity, Ethnicity and Gender Identification in Individual’s Moral Judgments; The Mediation Effect of Self-transcendence

Jing Huey Chin, Shaheen Mansori, Zabihollah Rezaee and Saeid Homayoun

Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, Volume 29, Issue 4, December 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.39

Keywords: Ethics, ethnicity, gender difference, moral judgment, religion, religiosity, theory of basic human values, theory of planned behaviour

Published on: 13 December 2021

Most recently, corporate financial scandals, and unethical behaviour cast doubt on investors and raised public concern globally. It is due to the weak corporate governance structure and low ethic awareness amongst the people. The purpose of this research is therefore to justify the factors that influence an individual’s moral judgement. This study also seeks to provide practical recommendations to corporations and different associations. As such, to evaluate the proposed hypotheses, 300 self-administered questionnaires were distributed in five universities in Malaysia using a non-probability sampling approach. As a result, the findings demonstrate that ethnicity has the highest impact on self-transcendence and moral judgement, followed by religiosity and gender identification (gender difference). The contribution of this research is to evaluate the relationships between religiosity, ethnicity, and gender identification towards moral judgement with the intervention of mediating variable (self-transcendence). In essence, ethical values and moral obligations should be highlighted in corporations, and these values should be practised and embraced into the organisational culture. Thus, organisational decision-makers should highly emphasise the role of ethicality and morality in corporations because ethical competence aligns with an employee’s responsibility as a whole.

  • Ariza-Montes, A., Arjona-Fuentes, J. M., Han, H., & Law, R. (2017). Employee responsibility and basic human values in the hospitality sector. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 62, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.12.001

  • Baden, D. (2014). Look on the bright side: A comparison of positive and negative role models in business ethics education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13(2), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0251

  • Bairaktarova, D., & Woodcock, A. (2017). Engineering student’s ethical awareness and behavior: A new motivational model. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(4), 1129-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9814-x

  • Bossuyt, S., & Van Kenhove, P. (2016). Assertiveness bias in gender ethics research: Why women deserve the benefit of the doubt. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(3), 727-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3026-9

  • Breakey, H. (2018). Same duties, different motives: Ethical theory and the phenomenon of moral motive pluralism. Philosophical Studies, 175(2), 531-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0881-x

  • Chang, S. H., & Chou, C. H. (2018). Consumer intention toward bringing your own shopping bags in Taiwan: An application of ethics perspective and theory of planned behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061815

  • Chen, C., Tuliao, K. V., Cullen, J. B., & Chang, Y. Y. (2016). Does gender influence managers’ ethics? A cross-cultural analysis. Business Ethics, 25(4), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12122

  • Ferencz-Kaddari, M., Shifman, A., & Koslowsky, M. (2016). Modeling psychologists’ ethical intention. Psychological Reports, 118(3), 691-709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116647691

  • Godlewska, M., & Pilewicz, T. (2018). The impact of interplay between formal and informal institutions on corporate governance systems: A comparative study of CEECs. Comparative Economic Research, 21(4), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0028

  • Grosby, S. (2015). Myth and symbol: The persistence of ethnicity and religion: John Armstrong and nationality. Nations and Nationalism, 21(1), 182-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12107

  • Hamzah, A. H., Zulkafli, A. H., & Tapa, A. (2018). Corporate expropriation from the perspective of non-contestability of ownership structure and corporate governance. Global Business & Management Research, 10(3), 403-418.

  • Hashim, M. J., Kannan, K. N., & Wegener, D. T. (2018). Central role of moral obligations in determining intentions to engage in digital piracy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(3), 934-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1481670

  • Henrich, N. J., Dodek, P. M., Gladstone, E., Alden, L., Keenan, S. P., Reynolds, S., & Rodney, P. (2017). Consequences of moral distress in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study. American Journal of Critical Care, 26(4), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2017786

  • Ivan, O. R. (2019). Integrated reporting in the context of corporate governance. Case study on the adoption of integrated reporting of Romanian companies listed on BSE. Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, 9(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.2478/vjes-2018-0024

  • Jereb, E., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., & Šprajc, P. (2018). Gender differences and the awareness of plagiarism in higher education. Social Psychology of Education, 21(2), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9421-y

  • Jiang, Y., Xiao, L., Jalees, T., Naqvi, M. H., & Zaman, S. I. (2018). Moral and ethical antecedents of attitude toward counterfeit luxury products: Evidence from Pakistan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(15), 3519-3538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1480365

  • Karaca, S. S., Şenol, Z., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2018). Mutual interaction between corporate governance and enterprise risk management: A case study in Borsa Istanbul Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting & Finance, (78), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.412709

  • Lei, Q., & Chen, H. (2019). Corporate governance boundary, debt constraint, and investment efficiency. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(5), 1091-1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1526078

  • Maffini, C. S., & Kim-Ju, G. M. (2018). Fighting and bullying among Asian Americans and Latinos: Testing the roles of self-efficacy, ethnic identity, and ethnicity. Youth and Society, 50(8), 1019-1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16630560

  • Magun, V., Rudnev, M., & Schmidt, P. (2017). A typology of European values and Russians’ basic human values. Russian Social Science Review, 58(6), 509-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2017.1398547

  • Mansori, S., Rezaee, Z., Homayoun, S., & Noghondari, A. T. (2015). Do individual traits associate with ethical judgment? Journal of Management and Sustainability, 5(3), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v5n3p85

  • Mansori, S., Sambasivan, M., & Md-Sidin, S. (2015). Acceptance of novel products: The role of religiosity, ethnicity and values. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(1), 39-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-03-2013-0050

  • Moncrieff, M. A., & Lienard, P. (2018). Moral judgments of in-group and out-group harm in post-conflict urban and rural Croatian communities. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(Feb). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00212

  • Nakpodia, F., Adegbite, E., Amaeshi, K., & Owolabi, A. (2018). Neither principles nor rules: Making corporate governance work in sub-saharan Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3208-5

  • Nguyen, L. D., Ermasova, N., & Ermasov, S. (2016). Business ethics perceptions of Russian working adults: Do age, gender, education, and various work experiences make a difference? S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 81(1), 4-19.

  • Nikolić, J., & Zlatanović, D. (2018). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies: A systemic approach. Naše Gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 64(3), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2018-0016

  • Phinney, J. S., & Ong, A. D. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.271

  • Pohling, R., Bzdok, D., Eigenstetter, M., Stumpf, S., & Strobel, A. (2016). What is ethical competence? The role of empathy, personal values, and the five-factor model of personality in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 449-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2569-5

  • Primec, A., & Belak, J. (2018). Towards socially responsible corporate governance with authorities’ interventions. Management (Croatia), 23(1), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi/2018.23.1.203

  • Proctor, S. L., Kyle, J., Fefer, K., & Lau, Q. C. (2017). Examining racial microaggressions, race/ethnicity, gender, and bilingual status with school psychology students: The role of intersectionality. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(3), 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0156-8

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639-653. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383391

  • Różycka-Tran, J., Ha, T. T. K., Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Universals and specifics of the structure and hierarchy of basic human values in Vietnam. Health Psychology Report, 3(3), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2017.65857

  • Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005001

  • Seddig, D., & Davidov, E. (2018). Values, attitudes toward interpersonal violence, and interpersonal violent behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(May), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00604

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00951.x

  • Stoller, R. J. (1964). The hermaphroditic identity of hermaphrodites. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 139(5), 453-457. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196411000-00005

  • Surbhi, & Vij, S. (2018). The interface of corporate governance with M&A: Research themes. The IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 15(3), 19-38. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3313345

  • Tevrüz, S., Turgut, T., & Çinko, M. (2015). Integrating Turkish work and achievement goals with Schwartz’s human values. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 259-279. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i2.825

  • Turban, J. L., & Ehrensaft, D. (2018). Research review: Gender identity in youth: Treatment paradigms and controversies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(12), 1228-1243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12833

  • Wang, L. C., & Calvano, L. (2013). Is business ethics education effective? An analysis of gender, personal ethical perspectives, and moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 591-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1973

  • Ward, S. J., & King, L. A. (2018). Moral self-regulation, moral identity, and religiosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 495-525. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000207

  • Wegner, R., Roy, A. R., DaCova, A., & Gorman, K. R. (2019). Similarities and differences in general drinking game behavior, game-specific behavior, and peer influence factors across race/ethnicity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 89(5), 616. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000393

  • Yacob, Y., Ali, J. K., Roslin, R., & Ting, H. (2018). The relationships between member participation, trust, Behavioural loyalty, and the moderating effect of ethnicity: An explanatory study of value co-creation among cooperative members in Sarawak. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(2), 505-522.

  • Yusupova, G. (2018). Making ethnic boundaries in the society of religious renaissance: Islam and everyday ethnicity in post-Soviet Tatarstan. National Identities, 20(4), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2016.1265493

  • Zaman, S. I., Jalees, T., Jiang, Y., & Kazmi, S. H. A. (2018). Testing and incorporating additional determinants of ethics in counterfeiting luxury research according to the theory of planned behavior. Psihologija, 51(2), 163-196. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI170211014Z

  • Zayer, L. T., & Coleman, C. A. (2015). Advertising professionals’ perceptions of the impact of gender portrayals on men and women: A question of ethics? Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.975878

ISSN 0128-7680

e-ISSN 2231-8526

Article ID

JSSH-8211-2021

Download Full Article PDF

Share this article

Recent Articles