PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

Outdated tendering system is a significant obstacle in the momentum of public sector development in Pakistan. This study aims to examine various undiscovered part of public tendering through a detailed survey from key professionals, experts, and decision-makers of public projects. Furthermore, research covers the present status of public tendering in Pakistan and provides recommendations as per experts' opinion. This paper exhaustively highlights how the classical customs of the public tendering in Pakistan could track the old-fashioned sector to an upright path. Intensive interviews and questionnaire surveys were carried out throughout the country for data compilation. The one-way ANOVA test was performed to verify the perception of various participants and to reject the null hypothesis. The study revealed various interesting facts of present-day situations of public tendering. Various pitfalls in public tendering were underlined in the speculation of experts. The study concluded that public tendering in Pakistan is crowded with severe threats that may be alarming for the future of the industry. Un-discovering of alarming facts about public tendering in Pakistan opens the directions for several researchers in terms of exploring project case studies further. The research is an eye-opener for policymakers, experts, decision-makers and governmental bodies to regulate the public tendering system accordingly.

• Af Wahlberg, A. E., & Poom, L. (2015). An empirical test of nonresponse bias in internet surveys. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 336-347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1111212

• Alzahrani, J. I., & Emsley, M. W. (2013). The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 313-322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.006

• Ayoti, B. (2012). Factors influencing effectiveness in tendering process in public sector; The case of Nyeri County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation). University of Nairobi, Kenya.

• Azhar, N., Farooqui, R. U., & Ahmed, S. M. (2008, August 4-5). Cost overrun factors in construction industry of Pakistan. In First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDC–I), Advancing and Integrating Construction Education, Research & Practice (pp. 499-508). Karachi, Pakistan.

• Birjandi, A. K., Akhyani, F., Sheikh, R., & Sana, S. S. (2019). Evaluation and selecting the contractor in bidding with incomplete information using MCGDM method. Soft Computing, 23(20), 10569-10585. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04050-y

• Bochenek, J. (2014). The contractor selection criteria in open and restricted procedures in public sector in selected EU countries. Procedia Engineering, 85, 69-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.530

• Cheaitou, A., Larbi, R., & Al-Housani, B. (2019). Decision making framework for tender evaluation and contractor selection in public organizations with risk considerations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68(January 2017), 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.02.007

• Elsayah, O. S. (2016). A framework for improvement of contractor selection procedures on major construction project in Libya. Retrieved October 27, 2018, from https://www.napier.ac.uk/~/media/worktribe/output-453191/a-framework-for-improvement-of-contractor-selection.pdf

• Farooqui, R. U., Saqib, M., Arif, F., & Lodi, S. H. (2008, August 4-5). An assesment of general trends adopted for bidding and procurement in the construction indystry of Pakistan. In First International Conference on Construction In Developing Countries (ICCIDC–I) “Advancing and Integrating Construction Education, Research & Practice” (pp. 153-160). Karachi, Pakistan.

• Hochstetter, J., Cachero, C., Cares, C., & Sepúlveda, S. (2004). Call for tenders challenges in practice: A field study. Retrieved January 27, 2019, from http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~cibse/CIBSEPapers/artigos/artigos_CIBSE12/paper_60.pdf

• Horat, I. M., Camanho, A. S., & Lima, A. F. (2013). Design of performance assessment system for selection of contractors in construction industry E-marketplaces. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(8), 910-917. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000691

• Ibrahim, M., Bawole, J. N., Obuobisa-Darko, T., Abubakar, A. B., & Kumasey, A. S. (2017). The legal regime and the compliance façade in public procurement in Ghana. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 370-390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2016-0156

• Jaskowski, P., Biruk, S., & Bucon, R. (2009). Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment. Automation in Construction, 19, 120-126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.014

• Jobling, P. E., & Smith, N. J. (2018). Experience of the role of contracts in megaproject execution. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management, Procurement and Law, 171(1), 18-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.17.00006

• Judit, S. (2017, November 8-10). Days of EU law. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (pp. 76-85). Győr, Hungary.

• Kadefors, A. (2005). Fairness in interorganizational project relations: Norms and strategies. Construction Management and Economics, 23(8), 871-878. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500184238

• Khan, T. H., & Khan, A. Q. (2015). Effects of lowest bidding bid awarding system in public sector construction projects in Pakistan. Developing Country Sudies, 5(3), 132-147.

• Khoso, A. R., & Yusof, A. M. (2020). Extended review of contractor selection in construction projects. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 47(7), 771-789. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2019-0258

• Kim, S. Y., Tuan, N. K., Lee, J. D., Pham, H., & Luu, V. T. (2018). Cost overrun factor analysis for hospital projects in Vietnam. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(1), 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0947-5

• Kog, F., & Yaman, H. (2016). A multi-agent systems-based contractor pre-qualification model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(6), 709-726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2016-0013

• Kog, F., Yaman, H., & Kog, F., & Yaman, H. (2014). A meta classification and analysis of contractor selection and prequalification. Procedia Engineering, 84, 302-310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.555

• Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Anvuur, A. M. (2008). Selecting sustainable teams for PPP projects. Building and Environment, 43, 999-1009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.02.001

• Liu, B., Huo, T., Meng, J., Gong, J., Shen, Q., & Sun, T. (2015). Identification of key contractor characteristic factors that affect project success under different project delivery systems. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(1), 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000388

• Long, N. D., Ogunlana, S., Quang, T., & Lam, K. C. (2004). Large construction projects in developing countries: A case study from Vietnam. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 553-561. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.004

• Lo, W., Lin, C. L., & Yan, M. R. (2007). Contractor’s opportunistic bidding behavior and equilibrium price level in the construction market. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(6), 409-416. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339364(2007)133:6(409)

• Lo, W., & Yan, M. R. (2009). Evaluating qualification-based selection system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), 458-465. doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000013

• Lundberg, S., & Bergman, M. A. (2017). Tendering design when price and quality is uncertain. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 310-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-04-2016-0063

• Mamavi, O., Meier, O., & Zerbib, R. (2017). How do strategic networks influence awarding contract? Evidence from French public procurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 357-369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2016-0091

• Maqsoom, A., Charoenngam, C., Masood, R., & Awais, M. (2014). Foreign market entry considerations of emerging economy firms: An example of Pakistani contractors. Procedia Engineering, 77, 222-228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.020

• Melody, A. H. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing and Health, 31(2), 180-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247

• Morenikeji, W. (2006). Research and analytical methods for social scientist, planners and environmentalist (1st Ed.). Jos, Nigeria: Jos University Press Ltd.

• Murtagh, S. R., & Brooks, T. (2019). Critical success factors for social value in construction procurement in Northern Ireland. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management, Procurement and Law, 172(5), 183-196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.19.00005

• Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, R. M. (2001). Contractor selection criteria: A cost-benefit analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(1), 96–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/17.913169

• Ng, S. T., Tang, Z., & Palaneeswaran, E. (2009). Factors contributing to the success of equipment-intensive subcontractors in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 736-744. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.006

• Patil, K. (2017). Public procurement policy for small and medium enterprises in developing countries: Evidence from India. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 391-410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-10-2016-0160

• Phogat, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2019). Evaluating the elements of just in time (JIT) for implementation in maintenance by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 36(1), 7-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2017-0279

• PPRA. (2015). Annual report 2014-15-public procurement regulatory authority. Retrieved May 13, 2020, from https://www.ppra.org.pk/areports.asp

• Wang, J., Yu, B., Tam, V. W. Y., Li, J., & Xu, X. (2019). Critical factors affecting willingness of design units towards construction waste minimization: An empirical study in Shenzhen, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 526-535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.253

• Watt, D. J., Kayis, B., & Willey, K. (2010). The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 51-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.04.003

• Wondimu, P. A., Klakegg, O. J., Lohne, J., & Lædre, O. (2020). Experiences with best-value procurement in Norway and the Netherlands. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(5), 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001814

• Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., & Cooper, P. A. (2000). Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender selection process. Construction Management and Economics, 18(7), 767-774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900433050

• Zhang, Y., Luo, H., & He, Y. (2015). A system for tender price evaluation of construction project based on big data. Procedia Engineering, 123, 606-614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.114