PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

J

• Arango, J., Gaviria, D., & Valencia, A. (2015). Differential calculus teaching through virtual learning objects in the field of management sciences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 412-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.490
  
  Aspinwall, L., Shaw, K. L., & Presmeg, N. C. (1997). Uncontrollable mental imagery: Graphical connections between a function and its derivative. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002976729261
  
  Bakker, A., & van Eerde, D. (2015). Chapter 16: An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 429-466). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16
  
  Bakri, S. R. A., Liew, C. Y., Chen, C. K., Tuh, M. H., & Ling, S. C. (2020). Bridging the gap between the derivatives and graph sketching in Calculus: An innovative game-based learning approach. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11962
  
  Bedada, T. B., & Machaba, M. F. (2022). Investigation of student’s perception learning calculus with GeoGebra and cycle model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(10), Article em2164. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12443
  
  Bibi, A., Ahmad, M., Shahid, W., Zamri, S. N. S., & Abedalaziz, N. A. M. (2019). An evolving research to tackle teaching and learning challenges during differential equations course: A combination of non-routine problems and teacher training. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5777
  
  Block, B.-M., & Mercorelli, P. (2015). Conceptual understanding of complex components and Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem: A design based research in Engineering. In 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (pp. 462-470). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096011
  
  Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Pearson A & B.
  
  Borji, V., Font, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Sánchez, A. (2018). Application of the complementarities of two theories, APOS and OSA, for the analysis of the university students ’ understanding on the graph of the function and its derivative. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2301-2315. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89514
  
  Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  
  Brijlall, D., & Ndlazi, N. J. (2019). Analysing engineering students’ understanding of integration to propose a genetic decomposition. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, Article 100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.006
  
  Bukhatwa, B., Al Ruqeishi, E. N. A., & Al Khamisi, F. M. H. (2022). The usefulness of technology-based interactive methods in teaching mathematics and statistics at the college level. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(3), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i3.4627
  
  Bungum, B., & Sanne, A. (2021). Conditions for the active involvement of teachers in a design-based research project. Designs for Learning, 13(1), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.169
  
  Cablas, J. C. (2023). The flipped classroom: Enhancing students’ learning in teaching calculus. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(6), 2014-2022. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.06.26
  
  Chechan, B., Ampadu, E., & Pears, A. (2023). Effect of using Desmos on high school students’ understanding and learning of functions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), Article em2331. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13540
  
  Chorney, S. (2021). Classroom practice and craft knowledge in teaching mathematics using Desmos: challenges and strategies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(12), 3203-3227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1931974
  
  Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Disessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
  
  Fatimah, S., & Yerizon. (2019). Analysis of difficulty learning calculus subject for mathematical education students. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(3), 80-84.
  
  Fitriani, Umar, K., Pasaribu, F., Novitasari, W., Samosir, B. S., & Yusmiati. (2023). Analysis of difficulty understanding student Mathematica by using online learning model. KnE Social Sciences, 180-187. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12898
  
  Gillani, S. N., Gujjar, A. A., & Choudhry, B. N. (2008). The use of instructional design in educational technology for effective teaching and learning. Journal on School Educational Technology, 3(3), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.3.3.736
  
  Goff, W. M., & Getenet, S. (2017). Design-based research in doctoral studies: Adding a new dimension to doctoral research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 107-121. https://doi.org/10.28945/3761
  
  Gulli, C. (2021). Technology in teaching mathematics: Desmos. Proceedings of GREAT Day, 2020(1), Article 8. https://knightscholar.geneseo.edu/proceedings-of-great-day/vol2020/iss1/8
  
  Haghjoo, S., & Reyhani, E. (2021). Undergraduate basic sciences and engineering students’ understanding of the concept of derivative. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 6(4), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i4.14093
  
  Hamda, H., Arwadi, F., Sukarna, S., & Syam, R. (2020). Instructional design of multivariable calculus course using Toulmin argument model to increase the understanding of students. ICLIQE 2020: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education, Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3453751
  
  Hamid, H. A., Tapsir, R., Shah, R. L. Z. R. M., Salleh, F. Z., Mustaffa, N., Lakim, K. H., & Sayed Abdulhamid, S. R. (2021). Pre-university students’ conceptual understanding of functions and derivatives through graphical reasoning. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(4), 1013-1022.
  
  Haryani, F., & Hamidah, A. S. (2022). Exploring the impact of technology-integrated mathematics worksheet in the teaching and learning during Covid-19 pandemic. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(3), 39-59. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1361559.pdf
  
  Hashemi, N., Kashefi, H., & Abu, M. S. (2020). The emphasis on generalization strategies in teaching integral: Calculus lesson plans. Sains Humanika, 12(3), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v12n3.1687
  
  Hitt, F., & Dufour, S. (2021). Introduction to calculus through an open-ended task in the context of speed: representations and actions by students in action. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 53(3), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01258-x
  
  Jamaludin, A. (2016). Modul motivasi diri [Self-motivation module]. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
  
  Jones, S. R., & Watson, K. L. (2018). Recommendations for a “target understanding” of the derivative concept for first-semester calculus teaching and learning. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4, 199-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0057-2
  
  Keene, K. A., Hall, W., & Duca, A. (2014). Sequence limits in calculus: Using design research and building on intuition to support instruction. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(4), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0597-8
  
  Keiser, J. M., & Lambdin, D. V. (1996). The clock is ticking: Time constraint issues in mathematics teaching reform. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9944440
  
  Kennedy-Clark, S. (2013). Research by design: Design-based research and the higher degree research student. Journal of Learning Design, 6(2), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i2.128
  
  Koller, V., Harvey, S., & Magnotta, M. (2008). Technology-based learning strategies. Social Policy Research Associates.
  
  Kwon, O. N., Bae, Y., & Oh, K. H. (2015). Design research on inquiry-based multivariable calculus: Focusing on students’ argumentation and instructional design. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(6), 997-1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0726-z
  
  Liang, S. (2016). Teaching the concept of limit by using conceptual conflict strategy and Desmos graphing calculator. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.62743
  
  Lu, J. C. C. (2023). Using YouTube as an effective educational tool to improve engineering mathematics teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Engineering Proceedings, 38(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023038024
  
  Makgakga, S., & Makwakwa, E. G. (2016). Exploring learners’ difficulties in solving grade 12 differential calculus: A case study of one secondary school in Polokwane district. In ISTE International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 13-25).Unisa Press. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/22899
  
  Makonye, J. P., & Luneta, K. (2014). Mathematical errors in differential calculus tasks in the Senior School Certificate Examinations in South Africa. Education as Change, 18(1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2013.847014
  
  Malaysian Qualifications Agency. (2019). Guidelines of Curriculum: Foundation (GCF). https://www2.mqa.gov.my/qad/GGP/2019/MQA%20GCF%20FINAL%2027.5.2019%20edited%20(1)_Clean.PDF
  
  Mariano, D. L. F., Barsana, J. G., Dimaculangan, K. A. C., Flores, L. A., Parto, F., Mariano, O. G., & Elipane, L. (2021). Lesson study: A tool for an improved instructional design in teaching integration by parts. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 3862-3869.
  
  Mcgee, D. L., & Moore-Russo, D. (2015). Impact of explicit presentation of slopes in three dimensions on students’ understanding of derivatives in multivariable calculus. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 357-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014
  
  McKim, C. (2023). Meaningful member-checking: A structured approach to member-checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2), 41-52.
  
  Meiliasari, M., Wijayanti, D. A., & Azima, L. A. (2021). An error analysis of students’ difficulties in differential calculus. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 5(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v5i1.1433
  
  Melnick, S. A., & Meister, D. G. (2008). A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers’ concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 40-56.
  
  Molina, M., Castro, E., & Castro, E. (2007). Teaching experiments within design research. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences: Annual Review, 2(4), 435-440. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v02i04/52362
  
  Norton, A. H., & McCloskey, A. (2008). Teaching experiments and professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9076-x
  
  Ojo, A., & Olanipekun, P. (2023). Examining students’ concept images in mathematics: The case of undergraduate calculus. Voice of the Publisher, 9(4), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.4236/vp.2023.94019
  
  Othman, Z. S. B., Khalid, A. K., & Mahat, A. B. (2018). Students’ common mistakes in basic differentiation topics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1974(1), Article 050009. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041709
  
  Pramesti, N., & Dewi, L. (2023). The implementation of understanding by design approach in mathematics learning on elementary school. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 6(2), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v6i2.16304
  
  Rashidi, M. N., Begum, R. A., Mokhtar, M., & Pereira, J. J. (2014). The conduct of structured interviews as research implementation method. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 1(1), 28-34.
  
  Rolf, K. R., & Slocum, T. A. (2021). Features of direct instruction: Interactive lessons. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14, 793-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00613-4
  
  Salinas, P., Quintero, E., & Fernández-Cárdenas, J. M. (2016). Fostering dialogue in the calculus classroom using dynamic digital technology. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0013-9
  
  Setiawan, A. A. (2022). Instructional design: Teaching algebraic equations to grade 8 students with involvement of mathematical reasoning in Cambridge IGCSE curriculum. Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v3i1.1035
  
  Shahid, I., Beek, A. Van, & McCahan, S. (2022). Observing instructor behaviour in an active learning classroom: A case study of an undergraduate calculus course. Proceedings 2022 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA-ACEG22) Conference. Paper 68.
  
  Shé, C. N., Bhaird, C. M. an, & Fhloinn, E. (2023). Factors that influence student engagement with technology-enhanced resources for formative assessments in first-year undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(10), 2670-2688. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2182725
  
  Shé, C. N., Fhloinn, E., & Bhaird, C. M. an. (2023). Student engagement with technology-enhanced resources in mathematics in higher education: A review. Mathematics, 11(3), Article 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030787
  
  Smith, T. W., & Strahan, D. (2004). Toward a prototype of expertise in teaching : A descriptive case study. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(4), 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487104267587
  
  Soluk, P., Greenwood-Lee, J., Peschke, J., Beltaos, A., Kumar, V., Muniykwa, K., Babiuk, S., & Zenteno, S. (2022). Building educational resilience in mathematics delivery and assessment (Working paper). In Pan-Commonwealth Forum 10 (PCF10), 2022. Commonwealth of Learning. https://doi.org/10.56059/pcf10.616
  
  Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602725
  
  Stephan, M. L. (2015). Conducting classroom design research with teachers. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47, 905-917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0651-6
  
  Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619
  
  The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
  
  Thomas, D. R. (2017). Feedback from research participants: Are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1219435
  
  Wagner, E. R., Orme, S. M., Turner, H. J., & Yopp, D. (2017). Encouraging example generation: A teaching experiment in first-semester calculus. Problems, Resources and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 27(2), 212-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1194340
  
  Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682