Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology
Pertanika Journal Home Facebook
Pertanika · Universiti Putra Malaysia Press

Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology

Official journal of Universiti Putra Malaysia for scholarly work across science, engineering and related technologies.

e-ISSN 2231-8526 ISSN 0128-7680
Research article

Radiographic Measurement of Cochlear in Sudanese Population using High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)

Lubna Bushara, Mohamed Yousef, Ikhlas Abdelaziz, Mogahid Zidan, Dalia Bilal and Mohammed El Wathig

https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.29.2.32
KeywordsCochlea, hearing loss, HRCT, measurement
Article content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the measurements of the cochlea among healthy subjects and hearing deafness subjects using a High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT). A total of 230 temporal bone HRCT cases were retrospectively investigated in the period spanning from 2011 to 2015. Three 64-slice units were used to examine patients with clinical complaints of hearing loss conditions at three Radiology departments in Khartoum, Sudan. For the control group (A) healthy subjects, the mean width of the right and left cochlear were 5.61±0.40 mm and 5.56±0.58 mm, the height were 3.56±0.36 mm and 3.54±0.36 mm, the basal turn width were 1.87±0.19 mm and 1.88 ±0.18 mm, the width of the cochlear nerve canal were 2.02±1.23 and 1.93±0.20, cochlear nerve density was 279.41±159.02 and 306.84±336.9 HU respectively. However, for the experimental group (B), the mean width of the right and left cochlear width were 5.38±0.46 mm and 5.34±0.30 mm, the height were 3.53±0.25 mm and 3.49±0.28mm, the basal turn width were 1.76±0.13 mm, and 1.79±0.13 mm, the width of the cochlear nerve canal were 1.75±0.18mm and 1.73±0.18mm, and cochlear nerve density were 232.84±316.82 and 196.58±230.05 HU, respectively. The study found there was a significant difference in cochlea’s measurement between the two groups with a p-value < 0.05. This study had established baseline measurements for the cochlear for the healthy Sudanese population. Furthermore, it found that HRCT of the temporal bone was the best for investigation of the cochlear and could provide a guide for the clinicians to manage congenital hearing loss.
Supporting literature

References

  1. Emanuel, D., Sumalai, M., & Letowski, T. (2009). Auditory function: Physiology and function of the hearing system. Helmet-Mounted Displays: Sensory, Perceptual, and Cognitive Issues, Edition, 1, 307-334.
  2. Fatterpekar, G. M., Mukherji, S. K., Alley, J., Lin, Y., & Castillo, M. (2000). Hypoplasia of the bony canal for the cochlear nerve in patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss: Initial observations. Radiology Radiology, 215(1), 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap36243
  3. Fernando, A., Jesus, B., Opulencia, A., Maglalang, G., & Chua, A. (2011). An anatomical study of the cochlea among filipinos using high-resolution computed tomography scans. Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 26(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v26i1.591
  4. Joshi, V. M., Navlekar, S. K., Kishore, G. R., Reddy, K. J., & Kumar, E. V. (2012). CT and MR imaging of the inner ear and brain in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Radiographics, 32(3), 683-698. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.323115073
  5. Marshall, L. (1981). Auditory processing in aging listeners. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(3), 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4603.226
  6. McClay, J. E., Tandy, R., Grundfast, K., Choi, S., Vezina, G., Zalzal, G., & Willner, A. (2002). Major and minor temporal bone abnormalities in children with and without congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 128(6), 664-671. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.6.664
  7. Mori, M. C., & Chang, K. W. (2012). CT analysis demonstrates that cochlear height does not change with age. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 33(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2713
  8. Nemzek, W. R., Brodie, H. A., Chong, B. W., Babcook, C. J., Hecht, S. T., Salamat, S., Ellis, W. G., & Seibert, J. A. (1996). Imaging Findings of the Developing Temporal Bone in Fetal Specimens. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 17(8), 1467-1477.
  9. Purcell, D. D., Fischbein, N. J., Patel, A., Johnson, J., & Lalwani, A. K. (2006). Two Temporal Bone Computed Tomography Measurements Increase Recognition of Malformations and Predict Sensorineural Hearing Loss. The Laryngoscope, 116(8), 1439-1446. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000229826.96593.13
  10. Stafford, J. L., Albert, M. S., Naeser, M. A., Sandor, T., & Garvey, A. J. (1988). Age-related differences in computed tomographic scan measurements. Archives of Neurology, 45(4), 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1988.00520280055016
  11. Teissier, N., Van Den Abbeele, T., Sebag, G., & Elmaleh-Berges, M. (2010). Computed tomography measurements of the normal and the pathologic cochlea in children. Pediatric Radiology, 40(3), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1423-2
  12. Tian, Q., Linthicum, F. H., & Fayad, J. N. (2006). Human cochleae with three turns: An unreported malformation. The Laryngoscope, 116(5), 800-803. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000209097.95444.59
  13. Wageih, G. (2017). Ear Anatomy. Global Journal of Otolaryngology, 4(1), Article 555630. https://doi.org/10.19080/GJO.2017.04.555630
  14. WHO. (2008). The global burden of disease 2004. World Health Organization.