Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
Pertanika Journal Home Facebook
Pertanika · Universiti Putra Malaysia Press

Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities

Official journal of Universiti Putra Malaysia for scholarly work across the social sciences, humanities and related interdisciplinary fields.

e-ISSN 2231-8534 ISSN 0128-7702
Browse latest issue Author guidelines Submit Here
Pre-press article

Evaluating the Performance of E-government: Does Citizens’ Access to ICT Matter?

Abdulrazaq Kayode Abdulkareem and Razlini Mohd Ramli

Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Pre-Press Published 2021-09-15
https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.03
KeywordsAccess to ICT, e-government performance, information quality, public value, service quality
Article content

Abstract

Different studies have evaluated the success of e-government in developed and developing countries. However, many of these studies rely on the economic and conventional approaches to evaluate e-government like other ICT projects. Also, they do not consider citizens’ access to ICT in their studies. This study, therefore, examines the moderating effect of citizens’ access to ICT on the performance of e-government within the context of IS Success Model and public value theory. The public value of e-government represents the net benefits of e-government. Data were collected from 369 experienced e-government users through a range of selected e-government services. The results show that citizens’ access to ICT positively and significantly moderates the relationship between actual use and the public value of e-government. This finding implies that access to ICT will drive more use of e-government and increase the value of e-government services. Also, the quality dimensions affect the actual use and user satisfaction with e-government. The most significant effect was established in the relationship between service quality and the actual use of e-government. In essence, this study emphasized the efficacy of ICT access as a stimulating effect on creating public value through increased citizens’ use of e-government for interacting with the government. Ultimately, it prompts the government to improve ICT access for the citizens to use more e-government services.
Supporting literature

References

  1. Abasilim, U., Gberevbie, D., & Ifaloye, O. (2017). Attaining a better public service delivery through e-governance adoption in Nigeria. In 4rd Covenant University Conference on E-Governance In Nigeria (CUCEN 2017). http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/8379/1/Binder2.pdf
  2. Abdelsalam, H. M., Reddick, C. G., & El Kadi, H. A. (2012). Success and failure of local e-government projects: Lessons learned from Egypt. In S. K. Aikins (Ed.), Digital democracy: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 183-201). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1740-7.ch010
  3. Abdulkareem, A. K., & Ishola, A. A. (2016). E-government in Nigeria: Progress and prospects. Ilorin Journal of Administration and Development, 12(1), 59-67.
  4. Abdulkareem, A. K., Ameen, A., & Ishola, A. A. (2016). A review of e-government as a tool for building citizens trust in the Nigerian government. Sahel Analyst: Journal of Management Sciences, 13(2), 10.
  5. Adam, I. O. (2020). Examining e-government development effects on corruption in Africa: The mediating effects of ICT development and institutional quality. Technology in Society, Article 101245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101245
  6. Adeyemo, A. (2011). E-government implementation in Nigeria: An assessment of Nigerias global e-gov ranking. Journal of Internet and Information Systems, 2(1), 11-19.
  7. Agbabiaka, O. (2018, April 4-6). The public value creation of egovernment: An empirical study from citizen perspective. In 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2018). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209416
  8. Aldholay, A. H., Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Alrajawy, I., & Nusari, M. (2018). The role of compatibility as a moderating variable in the information system success model: The context of online learning usage. International Journal of Management and Human Science, 2(1), 9-15.
  9. Alford, J., Douglas, S., Geuijen, K., & ‘t Hart, P. (2017). Ventures in public value management: Introduction to the symposium. Public Management Review, 19(5), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192160
  10. Alhabshi, S. M. (2009). What we have & have-not: E-government in Malaysia. In International Conference on Malaysia: Malaysia in Global Perspective, 27-28 September 2009, Cairo University, Egypt. http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/10902
  11. Al-Haddad, S. A., Hyland, P., & Hubona, G. (2011). An assessment tool for e-government system performance: A citizen-centric model. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2011; pp. 1-11). AIS eLibrary. https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/1955
  12. Ali, H., & Al Kabbi, R. (2018). M-government applications: Measurement of users’ satisfaction in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 14(4), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2018.10015111
  13. Alomari, M., Woods, P., & Sandhu, K. (2012). Predictors for e-government adoption in Jordan; Deployment of an empirical evaluation based on a citizen-centric approach. Information Technology & People, 25(2), 207-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593841211232712
  14. Alzahrani, A. I., Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., Alfarraj, O., & Alalwan, N. (2019). Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(2), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617726123
  15. Aminah, S., Ditari, Y., Kumaralalita, L., Hidayanto, A. N., Phusavat, K., & Anussornnitisarn, P. (2018). E-procurement system success factors and their impact on transparency perceptions: Perspectives from the supplier side. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 14(2), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2018.090929
  16. Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Government information quarterly, 33(1), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003
  17. Asongu, S. A., & Le Roux, S. (2017). Enhancing ICT for inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.026
  18. Ayo, C., & Azeta, A. (2009, June 29-30). A framework for voice-enabled m-voting system: Nigeria a case study [Paper presentation]. 9th European Conference on e-Government (ECEG 2009), Westminster Business School, University of Westminster, London, UK.
  19. Balaban, I., Mu, E., & Divjak, B. (2013). Development of an electronic Portfolio system success model: An information systems approach. Computers & Education, 60(1), 396-411.
  20. Bossert, T., Hsiao, W., Barrera, M., Alarcon, L., Leo, M., & Casares, C. (1998). Transformation of ministries of health in the era of health reform: The case of Colombia. Health Policy and Planning, 13(1), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/13.1.59
  21. Bureau of Public Service Reforms. (2019). 2018 Federal Government Scorecard Ranking & Scoring of Ministries, Department & Agencies (MDAS). https://www.bpsr.gov.ng/index.php/publications/bpsr-resources/reports/general-report/study-survey-review#
  22. Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors*. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
  23. Chen, J. V., Jubilado, R. J. M., Capistrano, E. P. S., & Yen, D. C. (2015). Factors affecting online tax filing - an application of the IS success model and trust theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 43(1), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.017
  24. Cho, S. E., & Park, H. W. (2012). Government organizations’ innovative use of the Internet: The case of the Twitter activity of South Korea’s Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Scientometrics, 90(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0519-2
  25. Connolly, R., Bannister, F., & Kearney, A. (2010). Government website service quality: A study of the Irish revenue online service. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(6), 649-667. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.45
  26. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  27. Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  28. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2016). Information systems success measurement. Foundations and Trends® in Information Systems, 2(1), 1-116. http://doi.org/10.1561/2900000005
  29. Deng, H. (2008). Towards objective benchmarking of electronic government: An inter-country analysis. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(3), 162-176.
  30. Deng, H., Karunasena, K., & Xu, W. (2018). Evaluating the performance of e-government in developing countries: A public value perspective. Internet Research, 28(1), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0296
  31. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x
  32. Du Bois, J., & Chigona, W. (2018). Use of free public Wi-Fi and telecentres in disadvantaged communities in the Western Cape. Development Informatics Association (IDIA 2018), 2. https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:6647/IDIA2018_Proceedings.pdf#page=14
  33. Erridge, A. (2007). Public procurement, public value and the Northern Ireland unemployment pilot project. Public Administration, 85(4), 1023-1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00674.x
  34. Farhan, H. R., & Sanderson, M. (2010). User’s satisfaction of Kuwait e-government portal: Organization of information in particular. In M. Janssen, W. Lamersdorf, J. Pries-Heje, & M. Roseman (Eds.), E-Government, E-Services and Global Processes (pp. 201-209). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15346-4_16
  35. Fatile, J. O. (2012). Electronic governance: Myth or opportunity for Nigerian public administration? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(9), 122.
  36. Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the greek taxation information system. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.013
  37. Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing information system success: The IS-impact measurement model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 18.
  38. Gartner, A. (2007). Majority of e-government initiatives fail or fall short of expectations. In Inc’s Executive Programs. San Diego.
  39. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
  40. Golubeva, A., & Merkuryeva, I. (2006). Demand for online government services: Case studies from St. Petersburg. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 11(3-4), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-2006-0105
  41. Gong, X., Lee, M. K., Liu, Z., & Zheng, X. (2018). Examining the role of tie strength in users’ continuance intention of second-generation mobile instant messaging services. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9852-9
  42. Grimsley, M., Meehan, A., & Tan, A. (2007). Evaluative design of e-government projects: A community development perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(2), 174-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160710751995
  43. Hahn, S.-E., Sparks, B., Wilkins, H., & Jin, X. (2017). E-service quality management of a hotel website: A scale and implications for management. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 26(7), 694-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2017.1309612
  44. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
  45. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  46. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  47. Hair Jr., J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2010). SEM: An introduction. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective, 5(6), 629-686.
  48. Heeks, R. (2008). Benchmarking e-government: Improving the national and international measurement, evaluation and comparison of e-government. In Evaluating Information Systems (pp. 257-301). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8587-0.50017-2
  49. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  50. Hirwade, M. A. (2010). Responding to information needs of the citizens through e-government portals and online services in India. The International Information & Library Review, 42(3), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2010.10762860
  51. Hsu, M.-H., & Chiu, C.-M. (2004). Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(5), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669969
  52. Ibrahim, R., Hilles, S. M. S., Muhammad Adam, S., Jamous, M. M., & Yafooz, W. M. S. (2016). Theoretical framework formation for e-government services evaluation: Case study of Federal Republic of Nigeria. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(37). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i37/94575
  53. Ifinedo, P., & Davidrajuh, R. (2005). Digital divide in Europe: assessing and comparing the e-readiness of a developed and an emerging economy in the Nordic region. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 2(2), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2005.007090
  54. International Telecommunications Union. (2019). Measuring digital development Facts and figures 2019. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2019.pdf
  55. Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Ramayah, T., & Mutahar, A. M. (2017). Internet usage, user satisfaction, task-technology fit, and performance impact among public sector employees in Yemen. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(3), 210-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/Ijilt-11-2016-0051
  56. Ismail, N. H., Ayub, A. F. M., & Luan, W. S. (2016). The relationship between Internet access frequency, attitudes towards the internet and internet self-efficacy and behaviour intention in using the internet among secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Training, 8(1), 1-8.
  57. Joshi, P. R., & Islam, S. (2018). E-government maturity model for sustainable e-government services from the perspective of developing countries. Sustainability, 10(6), 1882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061882
  58. Karunasena, K., & Deng, H. (2012). Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.005
  59. Kavanagh, S. (2014). Defining and creating value for the public. Government Finance Review, 57-60.
  60. Kearns, I. (2004). Public value and e-government. Citeseer.
  61. Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value. London, Cabinet Office.
  62. Khan, M. L., Welser, H. T., Cisneros, C., Manatong, G., & Idris, I. K. (2020). Digital inequality in the Appalachian Ohio: Understanding how demographics, internet access, and skills can shape vital information use (VIU). Telematics and Informatics, 50, Article 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101380
  63. Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
  64. Lee, J. B., & Porumbescu, G. A. (2019). Engendering inclusive e-government use through citizen IT training programs. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.007
  65. Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2019). Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management, 57(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103197
  66. Lin, H.-F. (2007). Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated Delone and Mclean Model. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 817-820. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9948
  67. Lowry, P. B., Karuga, G. G., & Richardson, V. J. (2007). Assessing leading institutions, faculty, and articles in premier information systems research journals. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS), 20(16), 142-203. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02016
  68. Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2019). National e-government performance and citizen satisfaction: A multilevel analysis across European countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 506-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317703691
  69. Makokha, M., & Ochieng, D. (2014). Assessing the success of ICT’s from a user perspective: a case of coffee research foundation. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689-1699. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v5n4p46
  70. Marie, T. T. (2016). Public values as essential criteria for public entrepreneurship: Water management in France. Utilities Policy, 40(1), 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.005
  71. Martins, J., Branco, F., Gonçalves, R., Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., Oliveira, T., Naranjo-Zolotov, M., & Cruz-Jesus, F. (2019). Assessing the success behind the use of education management information systems in higher education. Telematics And Informatics, 38(1), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.001
  72. Matthew, C. O., & Monica, N. A. (2011). E-readiness assessment of enugu state, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Information Management, 5(1), 25-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajim.2011.25.34
  73. Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government-centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x
  74. Mensah, I. K., Jianing, M., & Durrani, D. K. (2017). Factors influencing citizens’ intention to use e-government services: A case study of South Korean Students in China. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 13(1), 14-32. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2017010102
  75. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
  76. Mtebe, J. S., & Raphael, C. (2018). Key factors in learners’ satisfaction with the e-learning system at the University Of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 34(4), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2993
  77. National eGovernment Strategies. (2019). National eGovernment Strategies. https://www.negst.com.ng/index.php/about-us/a-few-words-about-us
  78. Nigeria Communications Commission. (2020). Industry Statistics. https://www.ncc.gov.ng/statistics-reports/industry-overview#
  79. Omar K., Scheepers H., Stockdale R. (2011). eGovernment service quality assessed through the public value lens. In M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A.Wimmer, Y. Tan (Eds.), Electronic Government (EGOV 2011). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6846. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_36
  80. Oni, A. A., Oni, S., Mbarika, V., & Ayo, C. K. (2017). Empirical study of user acceptance of online political participation: Integrating civic voluntarism model and theory of reasoned action. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.003
  81. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
  82. Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2012). The past, present, and future of “IS Success”. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00296
  83. Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2013). Analysing challenges, barriers and CSF of egov adoption. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(2), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161311325350
  84. Rao, V. R. (2018). Public services through multi-channel issues and challenges: A case from India. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Optimizing Current Practices in E-Services and Mobile Applications (pp. 273-300). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5026-6.ch014
  85. Reddick, C. G. (2005). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 38-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2004.10.003
  86. Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (2015). SmartPLS 3.2. 7. SmartPLS GmbH: Bönningstedt, Germany.
  87. Sarstedt, M., Hair Jr, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
  88. Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
  89. Scott, M., DeLone, W., & Golden, W. (2016). Measuring eGovernment success: A public value approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(3), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.11
  90. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  91. Seifert, J. W., & Chung, J. (2009). Using e-government to reinforce government–citizen relationships: Comparing government reform in the United States and China. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439308316404
  92. Shim, M., & Jo, H. S. (2020). What quality factors matter in enhancing the perceived benefits of online health information sites? Application of the updated DeLone and McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 137, Article 104093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104093
  93. Siddiquee, N. A. (2016). E-government and transformation of service delivery in developing countries. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(3), 368-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-09-2015-0039
  94. Sorn-In, K., Tuamsuk, K., & Chaopanon, W. (2015). Factors affecting the development of e-government using a citizen-centric approach. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 6(3), 206-222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-05-2014-0027
  95. Spreng, R. A., MacKenzie, S. B., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1996). A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000302
  96. Susanto, T. D., & Aljoza, M. (2015). Individual acceptance of e-Government services in a developing country: Dimensions of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use and the importance of trust and social influence. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.171.
  97. Talbot, C., & Wiggan, J. (2010). The public value of the National Audit Office. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011012321
  98. Teo, T. S., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
  99. Try, D. (2007). “Mind the gap, please” Using public value theory to examine executive take-up of results-based management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400810841218
  100. Try, D., & Radnor, Z. (2007). Developing an understanding of results-based management through public value theory. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(7), 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550710823542
  101. United Nations. (2018). United Nations E-Government Survey 2018: Gearing E-Government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. https://doi.org/10.18356/d54b9179-en
  102. Urbach, N., & Müller, B. (2012). The updated DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, & S. L. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory (pp. 1-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_1
  103. Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660
  104. Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004
  105. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7
  106. Wang, F. (2009, August 6-9). Personal influence on citizens’ utilization of government information: An Empirical Study. In 15th Americas Conference On Information Systems (AMCIS 2009; p. 563). http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/563/
  107. Wang, F., & Chen, Y. (2010). From potential users to practical users: Use of e-government service by Chinese migrant farmer workers. In 4th International Conference On Theory And Practice Of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2010; pp. 279-287). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1930321.1930380
  108. Wang, L.-Y.-K, Lew, S.-L., Lau, S.-H., & Leow, M.-C. (2019). Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application. Heliyon, 5(6), Article E01788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01788
  109. Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government information quarterly, 25(4), 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002
  110. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2009). Quality enhancing the continued use of e-government web sites: Evidence from e-citizens of Thailand. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2009092202
  111. Widiyanto, N., Sandhyaduhita, P. I., Hidayanto, A. N., & Munajat, Q. (2016). Exploring information quality dimensions of government agency’s information services through social media: A case of the Ministry of Education and Culture in Indonesia. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 12(3), 256-278. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.078421
  112. Wu, B. (2018). Patient continued use of online health care communities: web mining of patient-doctor communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(4), Article e126. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9127
  113. Yakubu, N., & Dasuki, S. (2018). Measuring e-learning success in developing countries: Applying the updated Delone And Mclean model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17(1), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.28945/4077
  114. Zaidi, S. K. R., Henderson, C. D., & Gupta, G. (2017). The moderating effect of culture on e-filing taxes: Evidence from India. Journal of Accounting In Emerging Economies, 7(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-05-2015-0038
  115. Zeleti, F. A., & Mustonen-Ollila, E. (2011). ICT education and wider access of citizens to icts as means to generate and distribute e-government content. In 11th European Conference on E-government. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259192864_ICT_Education_and_Access_Strategies_to_Generate_and_Distribute_e-Government_Content
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .